Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

View Poll Results: Nokian Extreme 294 vs. Schwalbe Ice Spiker

Voters
10. You may not vote on this poll
  • Nokian Extreme 294

    5 50.00%
  • Schwalbe Ice Spiker

    5 50.00%
Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    Sir Fallalot wroomwroomoops's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    5,179
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    The better winter tyre: Nokian Extreme 294 vs. Schwalbe Ice Spiker

    Schwalbe Ice Spiker vs. Nokian Extreme 294

    So there you have it: two great winter tyres, both in 26" (for the purpose of this poll), both 2.1" wide, about the same number of studs (294 for the Extreme, 304 for the Ice Spiker), and the studs are made of Tungsten Carbide in both cases. Both have wire beads.
    Both companies have more experience in making studded bicycle tyres than most (or even any) other.


    The Nokian Extreme 294 is 950g, the Schwalbe Ice Spiker is 980g. No big difference there, either.


    The Ice Spiker has KevlarGuard puncture protection.

    The Nokian Extreme has deeper knobs, better suited to bite into loose snow.


    Apart from this, I wouldn't know. I have started recently to use both of these tyres, and can't make up my mind which one I like more. It's early days for me.



    I'd love to hear your opinion.

  2. #2
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    23
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Both tires are great and you can't go wrong with either one. As you've noted they're more alike then they are different.

    In my experience, the Ice Spikers are a little better in loose snow and the Extremes are a little better on sheet ice. The difference is minor. I voted for the Schwalbe Ice Spikers because they're notably cheaper and easier to find locally in-store then the Nokian Extremes.

  3. #3
    Sir Fallalot wroomwroomoops's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    5,179
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by notnormal View Post
    Both tires are great and you can't go wrong with either one. As you've noted they're more alike then they are different.

    In my experience, the Ice Spikers are a little better in loose snow and the Extremes are a little better on sheet ice. The difference is minor. I voted for the Schwalbe Ice Spikers because they're notably cheaper and easier to find locally in-store then the Nokian Extremes.
    Thanks for your input.

    Well, I did notice that the Extreme's rubber seems to be grippier than the Ice Spiker's, but this might not be very important since in the winter it's the studs that do most of the action and not the rubber.

    I didn't yet vote, as I don't have enough experience with these tyres, though I am using both of them now almost every day.

  4. #4
    DNPAIMFB pinkrobe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Cowtown, AB
    My Bikes
    Titus El Guapo, Misfit diSSent, Cervelo Soloist Carbon, Wabi Lightning, et al.
    Posts
    4,654
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I rode the Ice Spikers for two winters, but have never used the Nokians. As notnormal said, they're both great tires. I'd give the nod to Schwalbe based on the lower cost.
    Proud Member of the HHCMF
    '06 Cervelo Soloist Carbon | '09 Titus El Guapo | '09 Misfit diSSent | '09 Wabi Lightning

  5. #5
    Sir Fallalot wroomwroomoops's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    5,179
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by pinkrobe View Post
    I rode the Ice Spikers for two winters, but have never used the Nokians. As notnormal said, they're both great tires. I'd give the nod to Schwalbe based on the lower cost.
    Why did you vote the Nokian then? I am confused.

    The Schwalbe Ice Spiker is more similar to the Nokian Hakka WXC300 Cheaper than the Extreme 294, shallower knobs, and their shape and size is very similar to those on the Ice Spiker.

  6. #6
    Sensible shoes. CastIron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    St. Paul,MN
    My Bikes
    A few.
    Posts
    8,799
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My Nokians have taken three seasons to wear down, so I've little to complain about outher than their total lack of puncture resistance and weight.

    I'll probably try something else next winter, though.
    Mike
    Quote Originally Posted by cedricbosch View Post
    It looks silly when you have quotes from other forum members in your signature. Nobody on this forum is that funny.
    Quote Originally Posted by cedricbosch View Post
    Why am I in your signature.

  7. #7
    Sir Fallalot wroomwroomoops's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    5,179
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Did you run the Extreme 294s?

  8. #8
    Sensible shoes. CastIron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    St. Paul,MN
    My Bikes
    A few.
    Posts
    8,799
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Still do. Winter isn't over. Their last year of service, however.
    Mike
    Quote Originally Posted by cedricbosch View Post
    It looks silly when you have quotes from other forum members in your signature. Nobody on this forum is that funny.
    Quote Originally Posted by cedricbosch View Post
    Why am I in your signature.

  9. #9
    Former Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    dropmachine.com
    Posts
    4,061
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Have used both for a few seasons. I had a wire bead break on an ice spiker, but it was warrantied. I think the Schwalbe has a bit more bite on skating-rink type ice. It's a toss up.

    I voted Schwalbe 'cause they look cooler than 294s.

    Not as cool, however, as the WXC300.

  10. #10
    Senior Member scoatw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    central ohio
    My Bikes
    96 gary fisher 'utopia' : 99 Softride 'Norwester'(for sale), 1972 Raleigh Twenty. Surly 1x1 converted to 1x8, 96 Turner Burner
    Posts
    1,361
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I started out this winter with the Schwalbe Snow studs and discovered that they were junk. I purchased a M&G 160 to put up front and it made quite a difference as far as handling is concerned. The Ice Spikers may do the job. But I'm going with the 294's. Based on the reviews I get here at BikeForums. Nokian has a good reputation. Folks tell me that here in Columbus, Studs aren't needed. But I disagree. The only time I use knobby tires is in the winter, and if I'm going to use Knobbies, then I want some studs in them.

  11. #11
    Sir Fallalot wroomwroomoops's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    5,179
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by scoatw View Post
    I started out this winter with the Schwalbe Snow studs and discovered that they were junk. I purchased a M&G 160 to put up front and it made quite a difference as far as handling is concerned. The Ice Spikers may do the job. But I'm going with the 294's. Based on the reviews I get here at BikeForums. Nokian has a good reputation. Folks tell me that here in Columbus, Studs aren't needed. But I disagree. The only time I use knobby tires is in the winter, and if I'm going to use Knobbies, then I want some studs in them.
    The Snow Studs are junk, I agree. They are actually OK for off-road/xc riding [EDIT: FOR SPRING/SUMMER/FALL!], if you pump them up nicely. But as winter tyres, they just don't perform worth ****.

    The Ice Spikers, however, are something completely different. And my experience so far is that they seem to be better than the Nokian Extreme 294.

    Now, let me understand something: you actually never tried either tyre, have you?

    Yes, Nokian has a good reputation as a company, and it's a Finnish company (my country), but I am leaning towards the Ice Spiker myself. It doesn't seem to have any weakness compared to the Extreme 294 and it has puncture protection, slightly more studs and a lower price. Seems like a winner, to me.

    I was really rooting for the Extreme 294, but alas...
    Last edited by wroomwroomoops; 03-05-08 at 07:37 AM.

  12. #12
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    23
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Schwalbe Snow Studs are commuter tires.
    Schwalbe Ice Spikers are off-road tires.

  13. #13
    Hooligan Abneycat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Base of the Rocky Mountains, Canada. Wonderous things!
    My Bikes
    2010 Cannondale Hooligan 3
    Posts
    1,431
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ice Spikers take it by a little bit IMO, the additional puncture protection you don't get with the Nokians is the kicker. These tires perform exceptionally well, and haven't failed me yet under some very serious riding conditions, both unloaded and completely loaded with over 150lbs of cargo. That said, everyone i've known to own Nokians has been happy with them - so they're both seemingly very good choices, doesn't seem like you'd go wrong with either one.

    I also disagree with notnormal. If you're in a situation where rutted terrain is your current adversary, snow studs won't help you. Therefore, if you commute and face those situations, Snow studs are "inadequate" tires. Additionally, with 300lbs on the bike, it doesn't take much for a Snow stud to break loose. Personal experience.

    The only feature of the snow stud I miss on the spiker is the reflex sidewall, nice touch.

    Marathon Winters look like a very good happy medium between the two though, they carry a good balance between the grip of the spikers and the ability to handle rutted stuff, and the decreased rolling resistance and reflex sidewalls of the Snow studs. They're good looking tires..

  14. #14
    Sir Fallalot wroomwroomoops's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    5,179
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by notnormal View Post
    Schwalbe Snow Studs are commuter tires.
    Schwalbe Ice Spikers are off-road tires.
    This is an artificial and useless categorization. If you commute on terrain and conditions like mine, Schwalbe Snow Studs are not commuter tyres, because you won't go anywhere with them. These conditions call for the Ice Spikers (or such), so then they are my winter commute tyres.

    I did use the Snow Studs for a large part of the winter before last. And I was afraid. Sometimes very afraid.

  15. #15
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    23
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Schwalbe Snow studs were designed as commuter tires. Schwalbe Ice Spikers were designed as off-road tires. There's a reason for the huge difference in performance.

    Ever think that the conditions you're riding on are more like off-road conditions than normal smooth pavement conditions with patches of black ice . . .

    If you have a problem with the categorization then lodge your complaint with Schwalbe .
    Under road tires they list the Snow Studs.
    Under Off-Road tires they list the Ice Spikers.
    Last edited by notnormal; 03-05-08 at 04:32 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •