Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Winter Cycling
Reload this Page >

Lifespand of quality studded tires

Search
Notices
Winter Cycling Don't let snow and ice discourage you this winter. The key element to year-round cycling is proper attire! Check out this winter cycling forum to chat with other ice bike fanatics.

Lifespand of quality studded tires

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-11-11, 01:26 PM
  #1  
Banned.
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,325
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Lifespand of quality studded tires

I am thinking of purchasing a quality set of studded tires for either my mountain bike or my folding bike. While I wouldn't get much use out of them in any one year, I'd expect to use them for a long time if they would last.

So assuming that they spend most of their time in storage, how long would they last?

Are there methods of storage that could lengthen their lifespan?

Given a choice would you use 26" tires on a mountain bike (no fenders) or 20" tires on a folder (with fenders) for riding in light snow with a variety of ice?
myrridin is offline  
Old 11-11-11, 05:25 PM
  #2  
12mph+ commuter
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Oak Park, IL
Posts: 863
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I will be on my four year using my Marathon Winters. After maybe 1000-2000 miles, they have lost 1-2% of their studs (fallen off). There is really no visible tread wear.
Scheherezade is offline  
Old 11-11-11, 09:04 PM
  #3  
Tawp Dawg
 
GriddleCakes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Anchorage, AK
Posts: 1,221

Bikes: '06 Surly Pugsley, '14 Surly Straggler, '88 Kuwahara Xtracycle, '10 Motobecane Outcast 29er, '?? Surly Cross Check (wife's), '00 Trek 4500 (wife's), '12 Windsor Oxford 3-speed (dogs')

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My first set of Nokian Extremes lasted 6 full seasons, before the sidewalls wore out; hadn't lost a stud on either and still plenty of metal sticking out past the rubber. These were ridden from fall to spring, pretty much every day except for deep powder days (and ski days, when I'd drive out of town), and saw a lot of asphalt during the swing seasons. The first two years I rode them I didn't have a car, and used the bike for a five day a week, 22 mile round trip commute.

If you use them lightly and mostly keep them in storage, I wouldn't be surprised if you could get a decade out of them.
GriddleCakes is offline  
Old 11-11-11, 10:45 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 342
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
This is my 2nd season on Nokian Hakkapeliitta and it seems like they're still brand new. The little rubber hair things that stick out (that's their technical name) are still on the sides.
ruindd is offline  
Old 11-12-11, 10:28 AM
  #5  
gbg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 628
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
If you ride on a fair amount of pavement along with ice and snow they will wear out a lot quicker.
I am in the 4th season on my nokian Mount and Ground and they basically look new.
I lost 1 stud but they are all still sharp, and I do hit some pavement (though I do avoid it as much as I can)
on the way to the snowy,icy trails.
On M&G's they do recommend riding the first 20 or so miles on dry pavement to seat the studs.
gbg is offline  
Old 11-12-11, 06:24 PM
  #6  
In the right lane
 
gerv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Des Moines
Posts: 9,557

Bikes: 1974 Huffy 3 speed

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
This is my 4th winter on my Nokian Hakkapeliitta . I do about close to 1000 miles a winter. There is still lots of tread left and the studs hardly seem worn at all. I figure a good 3 more seasons for sure.
gerv is offline  
Old 11-13-11, 05:03 PM
  #7  
Banned.
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,325
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I would likely only use these a couple of weeks each year (live in D/FW), so my real question is not how long before they wear out, but how long they would last in storage. What causes dry rot and what can be done to prevent/minimize it?

Also, has anyone used these tires on both 20" folder and a 26" bike and does one perform better than the other on the ice?
myrridin is offline  
Old 11-14-11, 12:20 PM
  #8  
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
 
AlmostTrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398

Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 941 Times in 504 Posts
I'd go with the 26 inch. Larger diameter means more studs contacting the ice at any given time.
AlmostTrick is offline  
Old 11-14-11, 03:50 PM
  #9  
Banned.
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,325
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AlmostTrick
I'd go with the 26 inch. Larger diameter means more studs contacting the ice at any given time.
Not following this logic. I can see where a wider tire would have more contact with the ground, but it doesn't seem like tire diameter would have much effect at all. Assuming of course that the amount of "give" the tire has under weight is the same between the two tire sizes, and I can't think of a reason for that "give" to be different...
myrridin is offline  
Old 11-14-11, 07:16 PM
  #10  
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
 
AlmostTrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398

Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 941 Times in 504 Posts
Originally Posted by myrridin
Not following this logic. I can see where a wider tire would have more contact with the ground, but it doesn't seem like tire diameter would have much effect at all. Assuming of course that the amount of "give" the tire has under weight is the same between the two tire sizes, and I can't think of a reason for that "give" to be different...
The larger diameter makes a longer contact patch. With proper inflation (probably lower psi on the 26) The entire width will contact the ground on either tire.

Of course ice traction is probably affected more by studded tire design than size. Some have more studs than others, and placement varies. I still think the most ice traction you can get would be found in a 26. (or 700, but that doesn't fit your requirements)
AlmostTrick is offline  
Old 11-14-11, 10:28 PM
  #11  
Dirt Bomb
 
sknhgy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,866
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5471 Post(s)
Liked 288 Times in 239 Posts
I have 3 or 4 years on my Nokia Mount and Grounds and they are still in good shape. I haven't lost a stud.

Studded tires are one of the best investments I've ever made. They let you ride for months when otherwise you would be looking out the window, waiting for spring. My neighbors make comments about me riding in the winter. They have no idea of all the fun I'm having.
__________________
sknhgy is offline  
Old 11-15-11, 04:09 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 467
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I say go with the 26", because it will ride in and out of ruts more easily. There is a reason why off-road cyclists are switching to 29" bikes - the bigger diameter means that the wheel rolls over irregularities and doesn't get 'stuck in a rut'.
hairytoes is offline  
Old 11-15-11, 04:45 AM
  #13  
Formerly Known as Newbie
 
Juha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 6,249
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
I keep mine (Hakkapeliitta W106) in a dry and unheated storage with no windows. For most of the summer it's dry, relatively cool and dark in there. Come winter, they are outdoors for 3-4 months, regardless of the weather. I think I'm on 7th or 8th season with them, and expect to have several more seasons to go.
__________________
To err is human. To moo is bovine.

Who is this General Failure anyway, and why is he reading my drive?


Become a Registered Member in Bike Forums
Community guidelines
Juha is offline  
Old 11-16-11, 07:38 AM
  #14  
aka: Mike J.
 
treebound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: between Milwaukee and Sheboygan in Wisconsin
Posts: 3,405

Bikes: 1995 Trek 520 is the current primary bike.

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Liked 58 Times in 39 Posts
Got 4-6 years on my Nokians before the sidewalls started to crack-out. They were kept either in a garage or in a basement during the off-season and out of the sunlight. Really a bummer.
__________________
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Life happens, don't be a spectator.
treebound is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jefnvk
Winter Cycling
17
01-30-19 01:12 PM
rgvg
Commuting
8
12-07-17 07:54 PM
tjspiel
Winter Cycling
9
02-12-12 01:41 PM
formicaman
Commuting
17
10-27-11 09:29 AM
mtalinm
Winter Cycling
5
02-02-11 07:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.