Originally Posted by
JMCraig
I've got the Santana literature and they make a good case for themselves as the premier tandem frame builders (leaving aside recumbents, I suppose).
J
Santana does make an impressive case for themselves. However, a lot of people find their marketing literature to be over the top.
Doesn't mean Santanas are bad bikes. It does mean you might want to question some of Sanatana's claims about their proprietary approaches.