Old 03-27-11, 11:50 AM
  #4  
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,663

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5766 Post(s)
Liked 2,538 Times in 1,404 Posts
Depending on the retainer design there may or may not be a reduction of the balls in the bearing. Though I agree that they serve mainly as an assembly convenience, there's no evidence that using one degrades performance in any way.

If you wish, there's no reason not to discard retainers, but in most cases no reason to do so. If you keep the retainer and aren't sure of it's orientation you can assemble the axle bearing and cup dry in your palm and observe which will make things obvious. Or you can use a simple test. Lay a pencil at an angle against the inside and outside of the retainer simulating the face of the cone and cup, the orientation that clears the retainer is correct.

To the OP- Looking at the specific retainers in the photo the closed side (counter-intuitively) nestles into the cup and the spindle enters the open side. Exactly opposite to your Redux post.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline