View Single Post
Old 07-07-11, 11:17 PM
  #11  
KD5NRH
Senior Member
 
KD5NRH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Stephenville TX
Posts: 3,697

Bikes: 2010 Trek 7100

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 697 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by sauerwald
Government money for roads is to allow for transportation - with a cul-de-sac, it turns what could have been transportation infrastructure into what is essentially a shared driveway for a group of homes. If I were in charge, no public money would be used to build or maintain any road which is not a through road. I suspect that suburban cul-de-sacs would become far less popular if people had to pay for them themselves, rather than expecting the people that they are excluding from their neighborhood to support it.
Good luck with that. I've been trying to get some support for the same treatment for "county roads" that dead end at a driveway. Nobody else gains any benefit from the road, yet it's maintained at taxpayer expense.
KD5NRH is offline