View Single Post
Old 09-11-11, 06:57 AM
  #24  
critofur
Banned.
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 51
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by hokie cycler
You're mincing words with the Trek rep. He says collision, you say it was a not a collision but it was obviously caused by a pot hole or your attempt to avoid the pot hole. That's not a manufacturing defect, it's an accident. What about this accident makes you think it's a manufacturing defect?
Shouldn't one be able to avoid a pothole and not expect their frame to be bent? Besides, I actually do think that hitting a pothole would not typically cause a bend in a bike frame? It wasn't an ultralight racing bike after all.

I think they're claiming I HIT something, as in head on. I did not. Perhaps when I speak to them on the phone Monday it will be more clear.
critofur is offline