Old 09-22-11, 08:46 AM
  #25  
MileHighMark
Old. Slow. Happy.
 
MileHighMark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 1,797
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Chris_W
You should have no problems replacing the large ring on a 4503 crankset. The one issue might come in the placement of the front derailleur - to get the inner plate of the derailleur to clear the middle ring, then the outer plate will be quite a bit higher than the big ring. It should still shift OK, but there will be a slightly increased chance of overshifting the chain to fall off the outside of the big ring. However, if you dial in the upper limit screw just perfectly then it should be OK. Certainly don't use an Ultegra FD (because the difference in height between the inner and outer plates is even larger); if you're using a 9-speed chain then go for the 4503 FD, if it is a 10-speed chain then use the 4603, 5603, and 5703 FDs - they should all work equally well.
Thanks for the reply. For the time being, I'm going to run the stock middle/outer rings. The 30t granny will get replaced with a 24t or 26t chainring, though. Shifters are bar-cons, so I'm not concerned with maintaining indexing up front. I have a couple of FSA Gossamer front mechs, and if those don't shift too well, I'll grab a 4503 FD.
MileHighMark is offline