Originally Posted by SSP

I'll have to respectfully disagree. There are many very good Windows programs out there (CycliStats being one of them - I've had Mac users compliment me on its ease of use). In most application arenas, there are many more Windows-based software choices available to consumers than their Mac-specific counterparts.

The fact that Macs are unable to run software that runs on 90% of computers on the planet reflects on Apple's arrogance (especially as it relates to providing options to their customers), more than the opposite reflects on Microsoft.

Of course, this is really a religious debate, and we'll probably never agree.

FWIW, I would love to provide software that runs on both platforms, but the cost of porting my apps over to a platform with such a small market share is far too prohibitive.