View Single Post
Old 06-21-12, 11:08 PM
  #2686  
rekmeyata
Senior Member
 
rekmeyata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,686

Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1125 Post(s)
Liked 249 Times in 200 Posts
Originally Posted by sudo bike
Conversely, one could argue that one who goes to the trouble to wear a helmet is concerned about safety.

But I think you are right, there really is no way to really prove either case. At best, it's conjecture based on a degree of logic; at worst, it's a wild-ass guess based on our biases .

I would note though, that what you forward is the idea of risk compensation: That the more one perceives safety, the less cautiously one carries oneself.
Absolutely. And yes, there may be a psychological perception of thinking one is safe could actually become less cautious. But, I killed a drunk driver last summer who wasn't buckled up and he drove recklessly. I also think some people over estimate their abilities to ride a bike or drive a car etc and therefore have no need for safety devices because "they know what their doing". So I think there's a double sided sword here.
rekmeyata is offline