Old 08-29-12, 01:52 AM
  #11  
mrrabbit 
Senior Member
 
mrrabbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 3,504

Bikes: 2001 Tommasini Sintesi w/ Campagnolo Daytona 10 Speed

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 145 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 35 Times in 30 Posts
Originally Posted by puchfinnland
I respect your opinion.

as I said- I can get the ultra 6 in there just fine, it will kind of work, but the chain angle side to side is too extreme on both the smallest and the biggest cog.

all the respacing will only improve the high or the low but not both
this is a junior 24" tubular bike.
I bought the ultra 6 because it does fit in 120mm spacing- but the distance between the bb and axle is much shorter then 700 wheels.

1. Wrong - FACT! I provided the Sutherland's Reference for you already.
2. 29mm to 31mm - that's only 1mm more per each side of the rear chainline centerline.
3. Respacing to spec does BOTH - see #2.
4. The short stays will always be a problem - and you'll always make it worse irregardless anytime you try to increase gears. Going Ultra-6 is not too bad - just 2mm. Going Ultra-7 at +7mm will be awful.

Pick your poison on #4.

=8-)
__________________
5000+ wheels built since 1984...

Disclaimer:

1. I do not claim to be an expert in bicycle mechanics despite my experience.
2. I like anyone will comment in other areas.
3. I do not own the preexisting concepts of DISH and ERD.
4. I will provide information as I always have to others that I believe will help them protect themselves from unscrupulous mechanics.
5. My all time favorite book is:

Kahane, Howard. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life
mrrabbit is offline