Old 10-11-12, 08:27 AM
  #237  
GeorgeBMac
Senior Member
 
GeorgeBMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,061

Bikes: 2012 Trek DS 8.5 all weather hybrid, 2008 LeMond Poprad cyclocross, 1992 Cannondale R500 roadbike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by asgelle
Pure revisionist history. The reality is Armstrong put himself in that position. The normal process would have had him go to arbitration where USADA would have had the burden of proof to show the charges were true. Armstrong declined his right to a hearing and accepted the charges and sanctions. That was purely his choice. He can't complain that having waived his right to a hearing, he never had a fair hearing.
That sounds good. And it is certainly the USADA's line. But it is not true...

Lance simply gave up fighting against an unbeatable foe. The USADA is clearly out to get him and they have virtually unlimited resources and unlimited funding. NOBODY could defend themselves against that and would be foolish to spend time and money trying...

Say what you will against him, but Lance is not a fool...
GeorgeBMac is offline