Old 05-02-13, 11:06 AM
  #6  
sirclicksalot
Senior Member
 
sirclicksalot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 51

Bikes: 85 Trek 620, 07 Masi Speciale Fixed, 86 Specialized Allez, 86 Bridgestone MB-2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Wilfred Laurier
...what component group do you think is field serviceable?
Well, the big issues with that group is reverse-threaded crank bolts. They have a self-extractor bolt though, so that's not actually a huge deal. Also, the chainring bolt spacings are funky. I guess field-serviceable is maybe the wrong word, more like field-replaceable, particularly if I'm dealing with a one-shop town somewhere in Eastern Oregon.

Originally Posted by Wilfred Laurier
..The main disadvantage would be the freewheel hub that might make bent or broken axles more likely if you overload the bike.
Although I do have the matching hubs, they're laced to Matrix tubulars, so I'd probably go with a modern wheelset anyway. Good point though. 126mm spacing would be questionable for touring/matching to most frames and the Campeur is 135mm, so reverse cold-setting/spacing the hubs would be a bad idea, IMHO.

Originally Posted by Wilfred Laurier
Also, don't campy shifters have a weird mounting bolt thread?
Well ****, now I've gotta go look at that.
sirclicksalot is offline