View Single Post
Old 12-16-13, 09:53 AM
  #48  
chaadster
Thread Killer
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,440

Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3143 Post(s)
Liked 1,707 Times in 1,031 Posts
Originally Posted by Bandera
If you've never driven a 911 or put miles on a Brooks saddle you wouldn't know what you were posting about.
One either has direct experience of a product or not, pretty simple.

The last 911 that I drove was a '72 911E. I found it to be a significant improvement in every way over the 356B and not particularly flawed, idiosyncratic surely. Modern 911s are beyond my ken but I'd love to give one a run on the Hill Country roads I drive in my roadster.

Any serious comparison of the development process of items as different as a simple bicycle seat and a complex sports car strikes me as so nebulous as to be meaningless. Apple are more comparable to oranges.

-Bandera
I don't share that perspective. I mean, if a NASA engineer or an F1 engineer, for example, can help build a space shuttle or a race car yet never pilot one, I still think they are pretty qualified to speak about them! No, they wouldn't be the go-to guys for input on what it's like to pilot one, but in the same sense, where not here talking about what it's like to sit on a Brooks or in a 911, either.
chaadster is offline