Originally Posted by
FBinNY
Then we're OK with each other's decision. I was responding directly with the "wouldn't you agree.... are they vain....." you stated in your opening premise. ...
Ah I see - you didn't see the string of four posts and took it out of context. That was more a closing statement than an opening premise.
I asked 350httr if he
wouldn't agree with something quoted from another writer (rydabent). Because, although both were advocating helmet use, 350htr had a more balanced viewpoint than the other writer. I'm asking if he
disagreed with what rydabent wrote. He did disagree with it. You disagree with it. I disagree with it.
You're arguing with me, evidently basing it on what you imagined that I probably wrote. I'm on the
same side as you, having made the
same arguments. Geeze, it must be something about this thread.
Does it help if I put it this way?
So in principle you would not agree with:
Originally Posted by
rydabent
Are they too vain, have a hairy chested idea they are such good rider, or simply dont understand the fact that the unexpected can happen to anyone. If a helmet only prevents road rash to the head isnt it worth wearing one.