View Single Post
Old 03-19-14, 08:40 PM
  #7226  
I-Like-To-Bike
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,971

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,534 Times in 1,044 Posts
Originally Posted by John C. Ratliff
In the safety profession, we use what is called the Hierarchy of Controls.
Originally Posted by howsteepisit
John, what is the incidence of those falls in which a hemet my be beneficial? Such a incidents per cyclist miles, or chance per ride, or any other measure you can find. If the incidence is sufficiently low, the the cost per averted injury os prohibitive or unreasonable.
Howsteepisit has asked the exactly correct question. Mr. Ratliff insists on placing the cart before the horse.

In any respectable Risk Management Program, the various potential hazards are considered and evaluated for their relative risk, be it financial or safety related, BEFORE various controls are considered. When hazards are evaluated as having an insignificant risk value (probability of event x likely severity of event,) seldom are controls considered necessary or even desirable. This is especially true where controls with negative effects on the desired activity /or with debatable capability in reducing the risk value, especially a hazard evaluated as having an already very low risk value.

Last edited by I-Like-To-Bike; 03-19-14 at 09:14 PM.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline