View Single Post
Old 04-04-14, 02:06 PM
  #8  
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,672

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5768 Post(s)
Liked 2,542 Times in 1,408 Posts
Originally Posted by HillRider
Actually road front derailleurs are remarkably tolerant of smaller-than-designed large chain rings. Years ago I bought my son a Trek 1220 which came with Shimano's 3x7 RSX triple group. The chainrings were 46/36/26 but the front derailleur was an RX-100, a 105 triple look alike, designed for a 52T large chainring.
Yes, going smaller is rarely an issue, especially with clamp on FD which can be lowered as much as wanted. I should have been clearer that the limitations on going smaller apply to braze on FDs which often cannot be lowered enough for good shift response
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline