View Single Post
Old 04-15-14, 11:14 AM
  #24  
hamster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 2,240
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by achoo
That's a huge qualifier there....
http://www.jappl.org/content/105/5/1462.full

We determined the effects of a cycle training program in which selected sessions were performed with low muscle glycogen content on training capacity and subsequent endurance performance (...) Seven endurance-trained cyclists/triathletes trained daily (High) alternating between 100-min steady-state aerobic rides (AT) one day, followed by a high-intensity interval training session (HIT; 8 × 5 min at maximum self-selected effort) the next day. Another seven subjects trained twice every second day (Low), first undertaking AT, then 1–2 h later, the HIT. These training schedules were maintained for 3 wk.

Resting muscle glycogen concentration (412 ± 51 vs. 577 ± 34 μmol/g dry wt), rates of whole body fat oxidation during 60SS (1,261 ± 247 vs. 1,698 ± 174 μmol·kg−1·60 min−1), (...) were increased only in Low (all P < 0.05). (...) Cycling performance improved by ∼10% in both Low and High.

Last edited by hamster; 04-15-14 at 11:33 AM.
hamster is offline