View Single Post
Old 04-22-14, 05:14 PM
  #14  
FMB42
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 454
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sculptingman
What problems have you seen to make this recommendation?
i have a converted Spot Ajax... Aluminum frame and carbon fork... With a 750 BB motor...
Thus far I have noted significantly less frame deflection than the pre-converted setup simply because the crank is no longer part of the chainring/spider. That is...the torque of my pedaling is filtered thru the motor gearing resulting in much smoother power and what LOOKS like a lot less stress on the frame...

but then, I have not been running it long... Are there going to be problems I am not foreseeing?
( the Ajax frame has been certified for Gates Belt drive, so I know its rear triangle has been engineered for very low deflection )
You're go to go with that BB motor setup! I'm talking about the far more typical hub motor type drive systems that place a lot of counter-torque on the dropouts.
FMB42 is offline