Old 06-23-14, 07:49 AM
  #36  
Taipei325
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 86
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by neeb
Interesting comments, especially that you noticed a big difference between the Foil HMF and HMX. I'm always reading that the ride of these bikes is the same and that the HMX layup simply reduces weight for the same ride feel, but I suspect not many people have actually ridden both. How would you describe the difference between the Foil HMF and HMX?

Regarding stiffness and liveliness/suppleness, I've always believed that there is no magic here. A less stiff bike will feel more supple and lively as long as it's not /too/ flexy. Maximum stiffness isn't always best, especially for lighter riders. There may be an ideal level of stiffness for a given rider depending on weight and riding style, and/or preferred feel. But I'd put money on the differences between the ride feel of the Foil and the Addict being as simple as that - the Foil is a bit stiffer, so the Addict will feel more lively for some riders and not stiff enough for others.

I have the Foil HMX incidentally.

Neeb...I agree 100% with you on the weight/stiffness issue. For me, at 72kg and high cadence climber, the Addict is just right.

As for the HMF....my Foil 20 would bend enough on the climbs to get brake rub. Never once happened on the Foil Team Issue...same wheels....same rider...same road...same effort. It was more than fine for zipping along the rollers and flats....but if you really got on it (i produce about 300 watts a peak...Phinney I am not) it would bend.
Taipei325 is offline