Originally Posted by Expatriate
There's a reason I'm asking. For 2006, GT has heaps of colors available, whereas Haro only has a few. The shop I work at part time has put the Haro bikes on sale, because they're having trouble selling them. How messed up is that? Sure, the kids that are getting them aren't all that dedicated if all they're worried about is color, but who would take a GT over a Haro based on color alone?
I have a 1982 Gt santa anna and its cromo, its a nicer bike but it rather ride a haro than it.