View Single Post
Old 04-01-15, 10:14 AM
  #24  
cale
Senior Member
 
cale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,248

Bikes: Kuota Ksano. Litespeed T5 gravel - brilliant!

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Stucky
Bad analogy- as helmets offer some actual benefit; and did not require the adoption of new standards in bike frames and components. Conversely, how many cycling accidents are caused because of inadequate braking? I'd bet very, very few. In-fact, I'd guess that more are caused by over-zealous use of brakes/grabbing too much in panic situations....and such incidents will actually increase if discs become common [So next, they'll probably start putting anti-lock brake systems on bikes! -Where does it end? All to solve a problem which doesn't exist for 98% of road cyclists; just to stimulate sales.)
You start off by saying it is a bad analogy and then claim that disc brakes off no benefits. I've had enough of responding to posters that adamantly state that there are no benefits. Look, if you want to stay with your existing system, that's fine. But you do nothing but stir up trouble with this denial of benefits. Go on then, tell me again how no benefits exist.
cale is offline