Old 07-17-15, 08:42 AM
  #71  
USAZorro
Señor Member
 
USAZorro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hardy, VA
Posts: 17,921

Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs

Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1491 Post(s)
Liked 1,087 Times in 637 Posts
Originally Posted by Ronno6
All plausible rationales for the less height enhanced rider.
In 63cm, 25" and especially 27" the larger tubes are considerably more esthetically correct.
I have a 27" Fuji Royale (well....2 actually.) from the early 80's and it is so huge that the skinny tubes
look (and ride) like so much spaghetti.Comfy, yes. Vibration damping, you bet.
Flexy.........yuppers. Just try to sprint on it.......you will take out riders on either side of you!

So, for my $$$$$ in my size, the Cannondale is the way to go..and go...and go...........
Cycling equipment in general can be cruel to the extremely short and the extremely tall. I do consider myself fortunate to be of average height (at least in the time range of the bicycles I most covet).
__________________
In search of what to search for.
USAZorro is offline