Originally Posted by
Kertrek
I'm not really too interested in an endurance bike right now, because my job pays peanuts and I'd rather not blow thousands of dollars on bikes. I've done a century ride on a racing bike and it was fine, really hilly though. But once I start riding double centuries, would a touring bike be a better choice than a racing bike?
Touring bikes are designed to carry a "lot" of weight, which means they are heavier than they need to be for a rando bike. If you aren't planning on touring, it might be not be the best choice.
What are you using currently?
I use a racing/endurance bike for long distance rides, and it's very comfortable for me. The only thing I might want is a lower gear or two (which a touring bike would have).