Old 05-17-16, 10:02 AM
  #20  
Maelochs
Senior Member
 
Maelochs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 11,295

Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE

Mentioned: 131 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5333 Post(s)
Liked 19 Times in 12 Posts
Dude, that is a test with two wildly dissimilar bikes on pavement. And good canti brakes can lock a front wheel too ... particularly depending on the terrain.

That is the thing with MTB brakes---they need to work on gravel, packed earth, sand, roots and rocks, wet leaves, every kind of ground cover ... so max braking is nothing like road bikes, which are on the road (and roads can vary a lot but ... ) The brakes on my Cannondale are amazing .... The brakes on my old Univega were amazing too. but so much depends on what you are riding on .... generally it is a low-traction surface so knobs make a huge difference (aggressive knobs? Low pressure? less aggressive knobs?) and tire pressure .... which can change for each ride, sometimes (I tried high pressure and aggressive knobs on Utah slickrock .... hmmmm.)

I am sure a 200 mm rotor stops harder than a 160 ... but again, it is about usable traction, which depends on more than the rotor size or even brake type.

I am not all-knowing, but as far as i do know, offroaders adopted discs because rim brakes are more likely to fail or at least hesitate when wet, and also rims wear really badly when riding in mud and grit using rim brakes.

I want to say Avid hydraulics .. but ai am too lazy to walk into the other room to look. I know they are 160 mm rotors. Maybe I should upgrade, ...
Maelochs is offline