View Single Post
Old 01-10-17, 11:48 PM
  #21  
PaulRivers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 6,432
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 539 Post(s)
Liked 44 Times in 38 Posts
Originally Posted by Banzai
Gravdals don't look different, functionally, from SMWs. Tight spaced chevron/v tread. Inner and outer row of studs. SMWs were cheaper though, and Schwalbe tires have always got me there. So I got Marathon Winters. Given the close similarities, I don't see Gravdals outperforming the SMW.
Here was the review from someone who used both:
http://www.bikeforums.net/winter-cyc...h-gravdal.html

Third winter biking. Previous winters have been with the schwalbe marathon...In both directions I run into the same things: snow, slush, frozen ruts & ice. And in both directions I have the same feedback: They push through slush (what wouldn't?), react to ruts as any tire (BUMPBUMPBUMP) & can take on ice better than the marathons, which are the only other studded tires I've ridden extensively...

These are marathon winters:


These are Gravdals:


Another maybe a little tougher looking pic of the marathon winters:


They look fairly different to me.

The Marathon Winters are great tires. They're what I ride in the winter. And they're definitely a lot cheaper. I just keep getting the impression that the marathons are faster, the gravdals are slower but grippier (and way more expensive). Schwalbe Marathon Winters are grippy enough for me for most of the riding I do.
PaulRivers is offline