Old 01-24-17, 09:16 PM
  #53  
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,706

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5779 Post(s)
Liked 2,576 Times in 1,427 Posts
Reality check.

It might just be me, but I wonder if the bill is defective. It simply doesn't make sense, unless the intent was to apply to 4 lane highways, meaning 2 lanes in each direction.

My problem is that most people don't call 2 lane roads "highways", and the fact that it wouldn't make sense to ban bikes from 2 lane roads, yet allow them on busier 4 lane roads.

So, if we assume I'm right, the bill isn't as restrictive or broad based as the version we've been debating.

However, even if I'm right, it's still a lousy bill. But it still would be nice to know what we were discussing.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline