Old 07-05-17, 10:43 AM
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Southern Appalachians
Posts: 453

Bikes: A hauler, a commuter, and a steamroller.

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Lazyass View Post
I can't stand compact cranks. A 34 is too small for me, I'm always in the smallest cogs or shifting into the 50 before I want to. A 50 is fine for a big ring but I prefer a 52/39, since I've never seen a 50/39. For a gravel bike that will go offroad some I really like the Tiagra triple, 50/39/30.
I'd like to see the strava log of you using a 52x11 for more than a few minutes total at DK200 or a similar event. Maybe you're Ted King, but he topped out at 44x10.

There just isn't much need for it on gravel (and this is the gravel forum, isn't it?). However, as you noted you liked the idea of a 30t front ring, there's plenty of use for lower gearing, especially on looser, silty surfaces and deep-poured gravel.

I went to a 1x on my gravel rig for this reason. 36x11 gets me as fast as I need to go, and in the event I take that bike on a very different sort of course I can simply change the front ring. 34/50 is a stupid crank to put on most gravel bikes, even with a 11-32.

46x11 is 30 mph with 35c tires (King's 44x10 with 650bx42mm tires was just over 31mph). You aren't pushing that gear on a straight on a gravel road for very long - especially not if there is any wind at all, and if the descent is long enough you'll still spin out (and if it is a serious gravel road, you don't want to go too much faster than 35 on the descents, especially if you have a sharp turn at the bottom - like most every event that has sent someone to the ER tends to have).

After every single ride or event, I hear the tough guys grumble about gearing on a climb. That's just stupid - we need more subcompact cranks, not more standard cranks, and certainly not a 39/50. Way too much overlap there, anyway, unless you're riding something like an 11-28, but you'll still have a ton of overlap in the middle of the cassette. What is the point of a double then, over a wide-range 1x?

All that ranting aside, a 32/48 isn't much different from a 34/50. A 32/48 with an 11-36 is starting to get somewhere, but not every RD can play that game. (I have two allroads-ish bikes running 11-36 right now; a Domane with the stock 4700 Tiagra RD and a Crossrip with a SRAM GX RD. The Crossrip also has a 32/48 crankset). The 36t on the Domane (with a 34t rear) isn't a huge change from a 32t - and my second largest cog is 32, so I can test this difference on every climb longer than a mile or two.

OP: Not that you're looking anymore, but you'll get a lot of flexibility out of a 1x system. Subcompact cranks are still hard as hell to find, and I don't think 32/48 is worth the trouble without a 36t cog in the back.
ph0rk is offline