Old 09-16-17, 07:18 AM
  #13  
JonathanGennick 
Senior Member
 
JonathanGennick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Munising, Michigan, USA
Posts: 4,131

Bikes: Priority 600, Priority Continuum, Devinci Dexter

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 685 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times in 37 Posts
My small city did the same thing a few years back -- converting four lanes into two lanes plus a center lane, plus some generously wide shoulders that are great for cycling. There are a surprising number of people who dislike the change and want to blast through town in four lanes instead. I would bet there are four feet at least in the paved shoulder, and at that point I really don't care whether cars veer over to give me three.

The three-lane approach is good for pedestrians too. It keeps the traffic further from the sidewalks. With four lanes you had school kids sometimes right up against the traffic lanes--because near the school there is no outlawn, and the sidewalk extends right up to the curb. The same is true elsewhere downtown -- sidewalk against the curb. I've been super happy with the three-lane approach. It makes the downtown area calmer and more pleasant to spend time in.
JonathanGennick is offline