Old 01-15-18, 10:31 PM
  #19  
johngwheeler
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 851
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 471 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Marcus_Ti
CX is the definition of aggressive geometry...and most companies 10 years ago were not selling many if any touring bikes, and the ones sold were friction-shifter only.
.... except this doesn't necessarily seem to be consistent across manufacturers, or even the same manufacturer. My Giant TCX is supposedly a "CX race bike", yet has a 71.5 degree HTA and 430mm chain stay, which (as far as I understand) are relatively "relaxed".

The same geometry in the guise of the TCX SX is magically classified as a Gravel Bike.

So I guess there is still some latitude in the definition!

In the end, I don't really care what they call it, but it is helpful to have a label to know what the intention of the bike is, and also to understand how the specs translate into the actual real-world experience on the track.
johngwheeler is offline