Old 01-09-06, 12:53 PM
  #16  
'nother
semifreddo amartuerer
 
'nother's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 4,599

Bikes: several

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
If you are always traveling within satellite range, the speed sensor is "redundant", when you have GPS. So is the barometric altimeter. But you guys say that like it's a bad thing. It's not: there are plenty of little nooks and crannies, at least around here, where there's no satellite coverage. If you are using only the GPS function to track speed/distance at these spots, you are out of luck. My buddy has a 301 (GPS only) and it's great when we're in the valleys, but up in the hills there are a lot of dead spots, dropouts, etc. and he's unable to get a distance reading on those until he's back in range and it interpolates. A little redundancy doesn't hurt.
'nother is offline