View Single Post
Old 05-13-18, 09:44 AM
  #9  
gugie 
Bike Butcher of Portland
 
gugie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,633

Bikes: It's complicated.

Mentioned: 1299 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4678 Post(s)
Liked 5,793 Times in 2,280 Posts
Your rear rack has the stigma of low price - it's already paid for.

;-)

Racks are handy things. Rear racks can hold a lot. The problem with weighting down the rear has been discussed ad nauseum with the rando crowd. It significantly affects the handling of the bike (tail wagging the dog), especially if you like to stand and pedal occassionally on uphills. Rear wheels already hold ~60% of the bike's weight, and dishing the wheel makes if weaker than the front, so why add more weight to it?

Go find pictures of randonneuring rides. Search images for Bicycle Quarterly's un-meeting, or just @rhm or @n_lerner's flicker sites (Rudi and Neal, respectively), you'll find almost all of them are riding with a handlebar bag. This puts the weight over the front wheel, which alleviates all of the issues above.

It can get expensive, however. You can easily spend $4-500 on a front rack and handlebar bag. You can also get by on the cheap with a bag that attaches to the handlebars. On a "taller" bike like yours, that might put some weight a bit higher than optimum, a small rack that sits right above the tire is more optimal.

Or just ride with your rear rack and a small rack top bag. It all depends on how much you want/need to carry.
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
gugie is offline