View Single Post
Old 06-13-18, 11:04 AM
  #15  
79pmooney
Senior Member
 
79pmooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,904

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,928 Times in 2,553 Posts
Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest
If they're estimating a different thing and calling it "power" then this has no relevance to anything.
It is relevant. The bike only sees applied power, yes. But the infrared sees power consumed, The difference is power lost to heat, etc. The infrared won't tell you which rat is faster but it will tell you a lot about bio-mechanics involved.

Ben
79pmooney is offline