View Single Post
Old 07-12-18, 12:05 PM
  #41  
Ironfish653
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 897

Bikes: 1997 Cannondale, 1976 Bridgestone, 1998 Softride

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 293 Post(s)
Liked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by fietsbob View Post
with the frontal area of a van the air resistance increases the faster you drive.. and gas mpg gets worse.
work thru your analogy to bikes with that.
I'll throw a spanner in to that, since it seems to be a spanner flinging kind of thread.
My SAG-mobile is a Honda Element, which is boxy and low-powered. 75 mph is it's max comfortable speed on the highway. It'll go faster, but fuel economy and handling go down sharply above 80mph. Drove to South Carolina for vacation one year. 2 pax + luggage, averaged 23 mpg. Did the same trip 2 summers later, with 3 pax, and the 20 cu.ft. cargo pod on the roof. Got better than 25 mpg.
Steady state cruising on I-95; Big increase in frontal area, but significant change in airflow, probably reduced drag at the rear edge of the roof.

That's why TT / Tri bikes are heavy and chunky looking compared to road racers, particularly the climbing specialists. You only accelerate once, then it's all about how smoothly you move through the air.
Ironfish653 is offline