View Single Post
Old 09-19-18, 07:46 AM
  #19  
DrIsotope
Non omnino gravis
 
DrIsotope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: SoCal, USA!
Posts: 8,553

Bikes: Nekobasu, Pandicorn, Lakitu

Mentioned: 119 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4905 Post(s)
Liked 1,731 Times in 958 Posts
Originally Posted by OBoile
A significant change of speed should change your calories burned per mile. As you no doubt know, the force required to overcome air resistance is proportional to the square of the air speed. Going faster is less efficient.
Not as much as you'd think. Aero efficiency is king.

80% intensity for an hour:
23.5 miles w/ 153ft @ 23.5mph, 39.7kcal/mi
Riding home at significantly less intensity:
23.1 miles w/ 722ft @ 19.1mph, 36.8kcal/mi

So going back home a good bit slower, about 60kcal difference. But going uphill? I'm heavy. Climbing 6,000ft in 3 hours, I averaged over 80kcal/mi... at around 8mph.
__________________
DrIsotope is offline