View Single Post
Old 10-29-18, 06:15 PM
  #48  
wphamilton
Senior Member
 
wphamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280

Bikes: Nashbar Road

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times in 228 Posts
Originally Posted by HTupolev
Okay, so your point was actually just that the power is too low relative to the heat dissipation ability of the frame to make a noticeable difference.
Correct.

Originally Posted by HTupolev
This is obviously true in the real-world case, although whether it would remain true in a hypothetical case where internal frame friction caused significant power loss depends on what we'd consider "significant." Note that one person you've been agreeing with in this thread - raria - has previously pondered whether flex about the cranks was slowing them down by three miles per hour, and has seemingly even purchased a new crankset in an effort to address the issue.

I agree that, with the frame being metal, there's probably a large range of hypothetical dissipative power loss in the frame which would be considered a meaningful performance loss to many people, while not being significant enough to cause frame heating that would be very apparent to a person.
Any difference of that magnitude, if due to the frame or cranks, would necessarily be from some other effect of the flexing.
wphamilton is offline