I suspect that, like many people, kross57 wishes to keep within his understanding range and not embrace the evolving nature of human speech. I suspect he is referring to you being the "one who takes issue with the norm". This way he defines his debating opponent (and as we see in politics defining your opponent works when a "lazy citizenship" is being addressed). A classic technique when one's stand isn't defendable.

This is not to say that kross57 isn't rightful in wishing to keep his view of the bike terms world intact. That's his American right. But when he reaches out and attacks those who have other views is when I take issue. As though he is trying to refuse others what he wants, to be considered correct. Andy