Old 12-15-18, 07:19 AM
  #28  
trekkie820
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 2,304

Bikes: 2004 Trek 4600 SS, 2016 Cannondale Cujo 2 SS

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by 79pmooney
Several reasons. I have never been under the impression they could take the abuse a pure fix gear can. I've known about those hubs since 1977 when Sheldon Brown used to come to the shop I worked at to hang with our mechanic. They were both Sturmey-Archer fans and both had those fix gear hubs. They felt those hubs were good for getting around, but not for serious roadies (specifically riders like me as they knew I rode a fix gear). Second - limited gear choices. My Cycle Oregon setup for Crater Lake had me on gears of 95", 67" and 49". That S-W would put me on 89", 67" and 56". A 14% higher low would have made that 9800' day a lot longer. My Mooney could handle a considerably bigger range easily. And, while designing my Mooney setup was real work, riding it is as pure as fix gears get.

Ben
Fair enough! As long as you're enjoying it who cares. I get **** for riding my singlespeed mountain bikes all the time
trekkie820 is offline