Old 02-03-19, 06:48 AM
  #8  
dsaul
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 973
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 209 Post(s)
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by unterhausen View Post
bicycles stay up because the rider steers the bicycle under their center of gravity, on average. If the rider can't do this, they are going down*. I doubt this is enhanced by raising the rider. Most people prefer the handling afforded by lower bb's, all else being equal.

The inverted pendulum is not really an example of stability. It's unstable in all positions and all lengths. It just shows that a shorter pendulum needs a higher bandwidth control system to remain upright. Conversely, bicycles are a stable system (self-righting) under normal operating conditions.

*just a simple thought experiment, if you are leaned at a given angle and want to get the center of contact of the wheels under your center of gravity, a higher bb will mean you have to move the wheels further on the ground in order to do this. So it's more difficult to control.
This. Especially that last point about the distance between the contact patch and the CG. With a lower bb riders will feel as if they are "in" the bike as opposed to being perched atop the bike.

To answer the OP - aside from pedal strike concerns, there is no downside to a lower bottom bracket.
dsaul is offline