Old 02-23-19, 11:24 PM
  #7  
Carbonfiberboy 
just another gosling
 
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,527

Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004

Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3885 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times in 1,383 Posts
Because generations of bike parts are not backward compatible, the frame is the cheap part, and old parts become unobtainable,. Everything wears out. I can't run disc brakes on my machine because the frame and fork lack the "braze-ons". I can run a drum, but one can't do that on a stock modern frame. No braze-on. BBs and cranksets. FDs and RDs, their attachments and cable pulls. Rear hubs and their compatibility issues. The bike needs to be designed from the start to accept particular components, whatever they are. Singles are much less complicated, but similarly you can't run even a 9-speed rig on a 70s road bike, the bars aren't designed for brifters, and you can't even get decent tires for those rims.

I was writing for the OP particularly. C'dales were stiff, inexpensive tandems, but the ride and handling were seldom loved.
__________________
Results matter
Carbonfiberboy is offline