Thread: Taking The Lane
View Single Post
Old 03-09-19, 09:25 PM
  #138  
Digital_Cowboy
Senior Member
 
Digital_Cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tampa/St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 9,352

Bikes: Specialized Hardrock Mountain (Stolen); Giant Seek 2 (Stolen); Diamondback Ascent mid 1980 - 1997

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by KraneXL
The cheaper (sub $100) cameras are fine for these basic recording purposes. Just keep it set at 60 fps for better slowmo and freeze frame should it be necessary. You only need to spend more for extra features when used predominately for higher level creative work.
Understandable, but I've seen footage from some of those "sub $100.00" camera's and they were as grainy as all get out. Very difficult to really make out much detail.

Now considering that IF I'm mistaken that part of the reason for running camera's is to gather evidence if needed to document harassment, or in the event of a being hit, or a hit and run. Footage and/or pictures that are are so grainy to be useless then it's just useless weight, and why bother?

There has got to be camera's that are both affordable and that produce quality footage and images. And then there's battery life/spare batteries to consider as well as memory card size.

Last edited by Digital_Cowboy; 03-09-19 at 09:29 PM.
Digital_Cowboy is offline