View Single Post
Old 06-01-19, 01:25 PM
  #9  
ThermionicScott 
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,627

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3870 Post(s)
Liked 2,563 Times in 1,577 Posts
Originally Posted by mstateglfr
I don't understand how they are a gravel shoe. I want to call it shallow marketing, but hopefully I'm missing something that makes these better on gravel than any of the dozens of similar priced mtb shoes to choose from.
Originally Posted by Marcus_Ti
Well....they're not really proper MTB, as they don't have toe-spike lugs. They're not road-racing as they don't have 3-bolt cleats, and they have proper treads, they're not "touring" as they're not walkable much with the carbon sole. They're really best suited to, well, light-offroading AKA gravel.
I'm rapidly becoming less surprised with each new product that is midway between "road" and "MTB" being introduced and marketed as "gravel." That "gravel" stuff generally meets the needs of most cyclists better than the previous extremes keeps me from being more cynical about the marketing.
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline