Old 06-27-19, 09:50 AM
  #96  
FrenchFit 
The Left Coast, USA
 
FrenchFit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,757

Bikes: Bulls, Bianchi, Koga, Trek, Miyata

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 361 Post(s)
Liked 25 Times in 18 Posts
Originally Posted by McBTC
It's probably a debate in itself as to whether running a marathon and cycling a century are roughly equivalent but I can't think of any exercise that tops the TdF, requiring on average about a century a day for weeks-- even so, the fact some can compete at that level probably is because it probably would just beat the body up too much to run (race) on average, a marathon a day for 21 days over a 23-day period.
There are male and female marathoners and ultra runners that have done the 50 in 50 and 60 marathons in 60 days, Dean did this running each of his back to back marathons in different states. Obviously, the logistics are insane, but they weren't racing. The Self-Transcendence 3100 requires about two marathons a day for a couple of months, and they are racing. Bitter ran 100 miles in under 12 hours. There are plenty of such examples.

Unless you are shooting for a remarkable finishing time, I don't think a century is particularly difficult. Add racing, hills and speed, then sure. TdF?, crazy.
__________________
There is more to life than simply increasing its speed. - Gandhi
FrenchFit is offline