View Single Post
Old 09-16-19, 12:21 PM
  #52  
Steeler_fanatic
Senior Member
 
Steeler_fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 80

Bikes: 2022 Trek Émonda SLR 6 eTap, 2018 Trek Domane ALR 5, 1974 Batavis Tour de l’Europe

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by Dean V
I guess calling in a "marketing strategy" would be a more diplomatic thing to call it.
But I just can't see the difference in value or cost of production between say a 105 and Dura Ace groupset.
Sure when you start using Ti (cassettes) or carbon it will cost more to produce, but overall with modern machinery and production methods I can't really see much of a difference.
GCN did a YouTube (
) where they interviewed a Shimano rep about the differences between Dura-Ace and Ultegra. The rep indicated, from a performance standpoint, they are essentially the same. The main differences were weight (materials) and finish. I assume there are significant technology differences between 105 (which I have and am perfectly happy with) and Ultegra/Dura-Ace.
Steeler_fanatic is offline