View Single Post
Old 12-26-19, 11:00 AM
  #58  
livedarklions
Tragically Ignorant
 
livedarklions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613

Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM

Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times in 5,054 Posts
Originally Posted by mr_bill
Yeah, no.

The regulatory framework is already there, see V2V, V2I, V2P and finally the catchall V2X communications. Just one of NHTSA’s top priorities. (At least until some twitter user tweets.)

Right now we are well before the knee, at chicken and egg. Once a critical mass of devices is reached....

-mr. bill

Yeah, no yourself, that isn't what the post described. That framework's basically a system of dedicated transponders and transmitters signaling between vehicles, infrastructure, etc. He's proposing a signal that would cut into someone's headphones and overriding the content that's being listened to (not clear by blasting the signal in the bluetooth frequency of the headphones or forcing the signal into the phone somehow). Not an expert on this, by any means, but I'd bet money there's no way to do that without running afoul of all sorts of statutes and regulations regarding deliberate interference with radio signals.

Last edited by livedarklions; 12-26-19 at 11:09 AM.
livedarklions is offline