Old 01-04-20, 06:40 AM
  #172  
genec
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 26,676

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9666 Post(s)
Liked 1,937 Times in 1,320 Posts
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike View Post
So just how smart and learned have Google, Tesla, Uber, Ford, et al. become? Perhaps smart enough to recognize that they are a long way off from being able to move beyond testing their proprietary prototypes in a few limited carefully selected geo-fenced zones. The more recent gossip from the PR flaks indicates that the introduction date for production and sale of driverless cars keeps getting pushed out into the future for fielding real driverless cars (ya know, SAE Level 5 autonomous cars, not cars with advanced cruise control.)

It seems only in Internet gossip threads like this and Elon Musk Twitter-dom is there anyone seriously suggesting that real driverless cars will be available for use by the public in the next 4 or 5 years. And that speculation is fueled more by wishful thinking, references to data collection metrics, and redefining driverless cars as something that still requires constant monitoring by a human driver, than real honest-to-goodness facts

Good take on the subject is at: The rhetoric about driverless cars is being toned down
And from the reader responses...
"Krafcik went on to say that the auto industry might never produce a car capable of driving at any time of year, in any weather, under any conditions." Well, duh... human beings can't even achieve *that* goal.
https://wreg.com/2020/01/02/multi-ca...lane-closures/
https://www.reviewjournal.com/local/...uries-1926386/
https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/26/weath...rnd/index.html


Silly human drivers... they just *think* they can drive in any and all conditions...
genec is offline