View Single Post
Old 02-19-06, 10:39 AM
  #10  
Portis
Banned.
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Home alone
Posts: 6,017

Bikes: Trek 4300 X 2. Trek 1000, Trek 6000

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Above 32 F, I am fine with just a regular pair of Shimano mountain bike shoes with two pairs of wool socks underneath. I bought them oversized to accomadate the socks. The Lake's will take me down about 12-15 more degrees.

So in essence, one could possibly be spending $200 or more to just gain a 15 degree range in temps. THat's not too great. I just got back from an hour and 45 minute ride. It was 17 when i left. I wore the Lake's and they were mostly comfortable. Temp was 20 by the time i got home. I firmly believe 20 F to be the low end of comfort for these shoes for me.

I have a great pair of winter cycling shoes. They are size 12 Wolverine hiking boots that are insulated with Thinsulate. I paid $40 for them on ebay a few years ago. I have worn them below zero many times without even a tinge of discomfort. They are always toasty warm.

It's just that i can't use them for clipless. Seems like somebody could easily design a warmer shoe, fashioned after something like my Wolverine hiking boots. I think the problem is that companys like Lake realize that nobody would buy them. They aren't "sexy" enough. They figure that most cyclists are looking for a shoe that looks and fits similar to their normal cycling foot wear. Trouble is that don't work. There winter shoes prove it.
Portis is offline