Old 10-02-21, 09:53 AM
Senior Member
CliffordK's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 26,877
Mentioned: 213 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15683 Post(s)
Liked 3,128 Times in 2,330 Posts
Originally Posted by grizzly59 View Post
Defense will have a PR campaign demonizing cyclists, especially groups on the highway. They just need 1 juror to say “not guilty”.
I don't think demonizing cyclists is the proper choice.

This will be a tough case to defend. But, the only defense will be to try to minimize the "Rolling Coal", and instead claim that he was just accelerating to pass. And, the difficulty for a young driver to pass a large group of cyclists caused the accident.

Was there a reason why the group that were hit weren't seen?

A lot of what I'm reading is from the viewpoint of the cyclists, but there may well be a different viewpoint of the driver.
CliffordK is offline