View Single Post
Old 02-26-06, 10:15 PM
  #15  
ettsn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 396
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
You are correct. The direct mechanical advantage of a 44-16 is the same as a 33-12 or even a 22-8, because they all share the same ratio of 2.75:1. Given that, there is a slight mechanical adantage at the point of chainring to chain with a larger chainring. The crankarm and the chainring work together as a Class 2 lever. Consider a prybar jammed under a big rock (also a T2 lever): the deeper you push the prybar under the rock, the better advantage the lever has versus the load (the rock). A longer prybar (crankarm in our case) will prove a much better overall mechanical advantage.

Summary: assuming the same gearing, is there a measurable difference in chainring sizes? Yes. Is there a noticeable difference? Probably not.

-Paul
ettsn is offline