View Single Post
Old 04-09-22, 07:03 PM
  #5  
2old
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: socal
Posts: 4,252
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 878 Post(s)
Liked 812 Times in 613 Posts
Originally Posted by linberl
I don't understand why all systems don't use wireless sensors (if they are cadence based). just sticking a sensor on a crank arm is easy for even the most non-mech person. My OM uses one and I loved it. Wireless controllers, too, should be standard. Wires are so yesterday, lol.
And if they're trying to market systems to DIY people (some of whom are less DiY than they think) wireless is even better. Is there some reason (other than cost) that this isn't common? If all you have are wires from the battery to the motor, and everything else is wireless, one model would fit a larger variety of bikes, too.
Great idea, but there must be something really difficult about it or the major OEM's would be racing to be the first.
2old is offline