View Single Post
Old 06-14-22, 07:18 AM
  #2  
OshkoshBiker
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Oshkosh, WI
Posts: 77

Bikes: DB Haanjo Comp, Trek 1.2, Murray MTB, Framed Minnesota 2.0, Top Fuel 8

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Liked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by hayden52
I recently acquired a set of Rally XC100 power pedals and was curious how the power measurement compared with my PowerTap hub, so I did a ride with my wife's Garmin paired to the PowerTap and my Wahoo! Elmnt paired to the pedals and uploaded both rides to Strava to compare. I also made a spreadsheet and graphed the results. What I noticed is that the pedals seem to smooth the data more than the hub, and (surprisingly) the hub measured about 4% higher. Maybe because the pedals only measure my left leg and double it, and there may be an imbalance. Here're the data:

Here are the links to the Strava rides:

Strava PowerTap
Strava Rally XC100

Cheers,
Gabe Cardona
If you like to delve into the topic further, do a Bland-Altman Analysis. You already have the spread sheet and it is easy to do. Look at the scatter plot and see if there is a bias. You can also plot a histogram of each power meter one over the other and see how the shape of the distributions differ.
OshkoshBiker is offline